A Gerund Is a Verb and a Noun in One

A Gerund Is a Verb and a Noun in One A Gerund Is a Verb and a Noun in One A Gerund Is a Verb and a Noun in One By Mark Nichol A gerund is a verb that also functions as a noun. For example, one can say one is engaged in the act of writing, but one can also say that what one is doing is a thing called writing. A gerund can be part of the subject of a sentence (â€Å"Writing takes a lot of effort†) or part of the object (â€Å"I’ve done a lot of writing†). Most writers generally employ gerunds without difficulty, but one aspect of their use can be confusing: the genitive case. In the genitive case, the pronoun associated with the gerund takes a different form than it would when associated with the same word used as a verb. For example, when expressing that you listened to some people talking, you would write, â€Å"I heard them talking.† However, if you are emphasizing talking as a thing rather than an action, you would write, â€Å"I heard their talking.† Or, consider the difference between â€Å"They heard it breaking† (breaking is a verb) and â€Å"They heard its breaking† (breaking is a gerund). Writers should also make a distinction with possessive forms of nouns: â€Å"The girl shouting awakened her parents† uses shouting as a verb (girl is the subject); in â€Å"The girl’s shouting awakened her parents,† however, shouting is a gerund (and shouting, not girl, is the subject). In many instances, the difference in connotation is insignificant, but whether one employs a simple verb or uses it as a gerund can change the sense of the sentence. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Grammar category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:When to Capitalize Animal and Plant Names3 Types of HeadingsDealing With A Character's Internal Thoughts

See Below CJ230 Wk5 Example

See Below CJ230 Wk5 Example See Below CJ230 Wk5 – Term Paper Example The Exclusionary Rule The exclusionary act effectively prevents all sorts of illegal evidences that may lead to imprisonment. The exclusionary act can be considered as â€Å"the only effective tool the judicial branch has to check against illegal searches conducted by police after a crime† (Writing, 2011). Motivation for illegal investigations is obviated when new evidence is denied its way to the court. On the other hand, when something is rejected, the prosecutors have to assemble a lot of evidence because of the exclusionary rule. Consequentially, trials are delayed and the frequency of plea bargains rises which does not happen without additional expenses. Addressing the Supreme Court, Justice Scalia wrote that because of the exclusionary rule, a costly toll is created which is against the enforcement of law and as a result of which, social costs are greatly increased (Writing, 2011). Violence always exists whether or not it is discovered in the illegal manner. Many crimina ls that are guilty of offense roam about the town just because sufficient evidence could not be produced at the trial. Exclusionary rule is in US but not in UK. Although the exclusionary rule says, â€Å"no object may be used in court as evidence if obtained illegally or without a proper search warrant† (Oracle ThinkQuest, n.d.). yet jury in US hardly gets a cop convicted of obtaining the evidence by illegal means. Therefore, the English way does not suit US. Nevertheless, I personally am against the exclusionary rule and appreciate the way cases are handled in UK. It is hard to see a criminal moving around free when we are sure he/she did the offense. References:Oracle ThinkQuest. (n.d.). Exclusionary Rule. Retrieved from http://library.thinkquest.org/2760/exclude.htm. Writing, A. (2011, July 14). Pros and Cons of the Exclusionary Rule. Retrieved from ehow.com/info_8734116_pros-cons-exclusionary-rule.html.